Home
|
YooskTV
|
Members
|
Public Figures
|
Features
|
Search
|
Journalists
|
Site Guide - FAQs
|
I'd like to ask
472 people in 178 cities are asking questions to 1,040 people
Login
Username
Password
Remember me
Forgot your password?
Question
Question
Richard Dodd
, Does your organisation have an official line on climate change- do you accept the science or dispute it? And if you accept it, do you accept the need for a radical change to the way large retailers transport, package and sell food?
Asked by
Londontowner
on Oct 28 2007 7:04:25 PM
and supported by 25 members
25
Answer
None of this is becoming as a revelation or new issue to the stores, because they have always had every reason to be as efficient as possible in things like distribution network, how they use packaging and bags, because cost has always been powerful financial incentive to get things right. So the idea that stores are pointlessly driving lorries full of products for hundreds of extra miles for no good reason or weighting things with packaging – it is all nonsense, because it has always been in their interest to be as efficient as possible: use as little materials as possible and use as little fuel as possible . What is new is this new awareness that has developed in recent years about the environmental impact means that stores are more focused on it and public awareness is focused on it and therefore retailers are trying to tell public about these issues as much as possible. This is not new for them this is something they have been doing for years. Retailers have always had environmental policy and they have always had strong financial incentive to reduce amount of the materials they use. We are all very focused now on this issue of climate change. Retailers broadly accept the principle that we must reduce emissions and they are working hard on their side to do all that. But the environmental questions are bigger than that. They generally accept and they have always done that it is right that they should be as efficient as they can and that they minimise their impact for environment and that is what they are doing.
MORE!
Comment
Topics you are talking about:
All Topics
Politics
Sport
Media
Environment
Local Issues
World Affairs
Business
Arts and entertainment
Science and Technology
Crime
People you are asking:
James Purnell
Margaret Curran
John Mason
Ian Robertson
Paul Hudson
Ian Levitt
Tom Watson MP
Denis MacShane
Lynne Featherstone
Davena Rankin
Simon Bradshaw
Alex Salmond
Douglas Carswell
David Beckham
Derek Wyatt
Blog
|
Contact Us
|
Answering on Yoosk
|
Start your own Yoosk
|
Advertisers
|
About Us
|
Terms of Service
|
Privacy Policy
|
Widget