Home
|
YooskTV
|
Members
|
Public Figures
|
Features
|
Search
|
Journalists
|
Site Guide - FAQs
|
I'd like to ask
472 people in 178 cities are asking questions to 1,040 people
Login
Username
Password
Remember me
Forgot your password?
Question
Question
Matt Phillips
, The ability to share albums and songs with friends, make recommendations and debate the worth of a group or artist has long been one of the intrinsic pleasures associated with listening to popular music. In the 80s, home taping was predicted to “kill” music, yet the music industry survived (and thrived because of) the humble cassette. Isn’t digital file sharing just the modern day equivalent of this age old practice?
Asked by
larry1
on Oct 30 2007 5:42:03 PM
and supported by 38 members
38
Answer
That was a BPI campaign that was done 25 years ago; the BPI’s copped a lot of flak for it. We tend to look forward rather than backwards, so we don’t tend to talk about that too much. There’s a massive difference between giving a C90 (cassette) to a mate and posting a perfect digital file on the internet for literally millions to take. This does reflect how little people realise what copyright infringement and piracy is all about. People have used the ‘Home Taping’ slogan to undermine very illegitimate arguments as to why file-sharing’s bad for the music industry.
MORE!
Comment
Topics you are talking about:
All Topics
Politics
Sport
Media
Environment
Local Issues
World Affairs
Business
Arts and entertainment
Science and Technology
Crime
People you are asking:
James Purnell
Margaret Curran
John Mason
Ian Robertson
Paul Hudson
Ian Levitt
Tom Watson MP
Denis MacShane
Lynne Featherstone
Davena Rankin
Simon Bradshaw
Alex Salmond
Douglas Carswell
David Beckham
Derek Wyatt
Blog
|
Contact Us
|
Answering on Yoosk
|
Start your own Yoosk
|
Advertisers
|
About Us
|
Terms of Service
|
Privacy Policy
|
Widget